Most people treat the day the sample goes out as the starting line. In practice the earlier stretch decides how fast the rest runs. Documents have to meet the current SIINAS requirements, and the local entity and trademark have to be in place first; miss either and there is nothing to submit. The clock really starts when the documents are complete and the sample is frozen.
Run testing and the audit alongside each other, then add the certificate and the mark licence, and a smooth project lands at two and a half to three months. Hit a peak-season queue or take an extra remediation round and four months and up is common. The rest of this piece works through the stretch from sample submission to certificate.
Sampling is not something the company controls. For products on the Type 5 scheme, which pairs type testing with a factory audit, samples are drawn by the LSPro at the factory or off the production line, sealed, and only then sent to the laboratory for type testing. Where one model spans several variants, the sampling plan is set by the certification body, the sample state has to match mass production, and a structural change part-way through means starting again.
Laboratories are mainly Indonesian bodies accredited by KAN and designated by the Ministry of Industry. An overseas laboratory can take the work where its accreditation body has a mutual recognition arrangement with KAN and it appears on the current designated list, which the LSPro confirms; reports from elsewhere mostly will not be accepted as they stand.
Testing centres on safety: insulation, withstand voltage, leakage current, earthing, temperature rise, abnormal operation and mechanical strength, with products that carry a plug adding gauge dimensions and insertion and withdrawal force. Temperature rise, earthing and gauge dimensions are the usual failures, and a nameplate that does not agree with the Indonesian manual gets the file returned as well.
The Type 5 factory audit looks at how the production system actually runs. It recognises the company's own quality control, so an ISO 9001 certificate is not on the audit list and a project can proceed without one. Having one does trim the audit workload by a noticeable amount.
The auditor flies to the production site; remote assessment is not possible, and travel and accommodation are borne by the applicant. This stage carries the widest variation, and a wait of one to two months in peak season is not unusual. Starting two months early works out cheaper than trying to make up the time later.
Testing and audit only run in parallel if the SIINAS account is already open, the local entity and documents are ready, and the sample is frozen. With those three in place the two lines move together; without them they can only be run in sequence, and that stretch cannot be saved.
The audit covers quality control, incoming inspection and consistency verification. It does not require the company to build a full in-house test facility, and some items can be outsourced. Where the records are complete, half a day to a day on site finishes it; where they are being patched together on the day, the auditor cannot get through and has to come back.
Passing the testing and the audit takes you halfway. Two documents still have to be obtained, one after the other.
The first is the SNI CoC, the certificate of conformity, issued by the LSPro; this step answers whether the product conforms. The second is the SPPT, the licence to use the SNI mark, filed through SIINAS. Many people assume the stamp comes from BSN, when approval and issuance actually sit with the Ministry of Industry. The applicant depends on the organisational form: a local producer files for itself, while an overseas manufacturer files through its local authorised representative. Both run to completion inside the system.
Under the current position, the SNI certificate runs five years and the SPPT one year. The SPPT hangs off the certificate and is maintained annually, so the two do not each run their own clock. This changed when the Ministry of Industry regulation took effect, and the four-year figure still found in older material is out of date.
The SPPT stage needs its own slot on the schedule, so getting the CoC in hand is not the end of the story; without the mark licence the product still cannot carry the SNI mark. Nor is the certificate the finish line. Annual surveillance reviews the records and pulls samples from the factory or the market for retesting, a missed audit brings suspension, and a change to the product structure or a key component has to be declared rather than discovered at the next review.
Document round trips come first. The Indonesian-language manual sits at the top of the priority list, and an English version put forward in its place comes back more often than not, at two to three weeks each way.
The local entity and trademark are the second. An overseas factory cannot hold the certificate itself, so the local importer or representative and the trademark authorisation have to be prepared in advance.
Remediation rounds are the third. Where temperature rise or abnormal operation falls short, changing the structure takes far longer than changing the document, and once it is done the testing has to be queued again.
The Indonesian system is still growing, and the SIINAS fields and audit positions move every so often, so last year's template cannot be reused as it stands. BlueAsia works its schedules backwards from the scheme type; until the scheme is fixed, any date quoted is provisional.
Contact: King Email: king.guo@cblueasia.comAddress: Building C, Hongjingda Industrial Park, No. 107 Beihuan Road, Shiyan Street, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, China BlueAsia delivers more than service!
Related News
