eCall – at its core – is a system that automatically places a distress call in the event of a crash. Sounds simple – but when you get into the compliance framework, the regulatory layers, technical standards, and transition schedules are quite granular.
2026 is a pivotal year: the CS‑domain (circuit‑switched) eCall sunset in Europe is already counting down – and China's own standard GB 45672-2025 (AECS) has been published. If you have eCall projects in your annual plan, the following timelines and standard version differences need close attention.
·Legal foundation
The EU eCall legal foundation is Regulation (EU) 2024/1180 – which replaced the older (EU) 2015/758 in 2024. It mandates eCall systems for all new M1 (passenger cars) and N1 (light commercial vehicles) models.
Beware of a non‑existent regulation number – (EU) 2025/1871 is an industry‑circulated error – the formal regulation is (EU) 2024/1180. Always double‑check the reference when preparing compliance documents.
·Does the certificate have a validity period?
This is a frequently misasked question. The certificate itself has no fixed expiry date – validity is maintained through annual CoP (Conformity of Production) audits. Each year, CoP audits check that production units match the certified sample – hardware configuration, software version, critical component sources – all reviewed. CoP failure suspends certificate usage rights – a remediation period is given – the timeline is determined by the issuing NB – there's no fixed 3‑month or 6‑month blanket rule.
If the harmonised standard is repealed or the regulation is updated – even with hardware unchanged – existing certificates cannot be used for new‑model WVTA applications. Already‑certified, unchanged, CoP‑compliant products can continue to be used for production of already‑type‑approved models.
·Technical standards
·Functional requirements: EN 17184:2024.
·Test methods: EN 17240:2024.
These are used together – and testing references both.
EN 17240:2024/A1 – the amendment adds more than just crash‑trigger and vibration test cases – it also updates MSD V3 interaction protocols, IPv6 support, and IMS‑CS dual‑mode interoperability test cases. Before designing a test plan, check which version of EN 17240 applies – test items can differ significantly.
2. NG‑eCall – IMS Transition and the 2027 Hard Milestone
·Three key dates
Industry focus has shifted from legacy CS‑domain eCall to NG‑eCall (IMS‑based next‑generation emergency calling). The reason: multiple EU countries are actively decommissioning 3G networks – relying solely on 3G CS for voice fallback is unsustainable.
Timeline:
·1 January 2025: NG‑eCall formally opens for applications.
·1 January 2026: CS‑eCall new applications are rejected – including extensions and change applications for existing CS‑eCall certificates.
·1 January 2027: CS‑eCall is no longer accepted for new type approvals.
Note: "new type approvals" – not a blanket cut‑off for existing products. Products certified before 2027 can continue to be sold.
For manufacturers: if you're still developing new products with CS‑domain eCall – after 2026, you can't apply for new models – and even legacy certificate extensions are blocked.
·IMS call‑setup latency – a hard metric
IMS call‑setup latency is a core NG‑eCall performance metric. EN 17184:2024 requires ≤3 seconds – measured from the in‑vehicle IMS call initiation to receipt of PSAP voice media – excluding crash‑detection and triggering time. Note: the timing start point is not from crash detection – if you calculate that way, your hardware timing budget will be wrong.
Many products fail here. IMS registration, SIP signalling exchange, and audio codec negotiation – each consumes part of the 3‑second budget. It's a very tight design target.
3. MSD (Minimum Set of Data) – Version Transition
·V2 to V3 transition
MSD is the critical data package that the eCall system automatically sends to the PSAP after establishing the voice channel – including vehicle location, VIN, crash time, heading, etc. The current mainstream version is MSD V2.
MSD V3 is mandated with the formal EN 17184:2024 – from 1 January 2027, new certification applications must use the formal EN 17184:2024 – the CEN/TS transition specification will no longer be accepted. These are not two independent parallel conditions – they are cause and effect: formal standard mandatory → V3 follows. For projects using the CEN/TS 17184 transition path, MSD V2 remains valid during the transition.
V3 adds significant new data fields and interaction changes – requiring PSAP‑side upgrades. Currently, PSAP upgrade progress varies across EU countries – confirm your target market's PSAP V3 support status early in the project.
4. Dual‑Mode Fallback and 3G Sunset
·IMS‑to‑CS fallback logic
NG‑eCall runs on IMS (IP Multimedia Subsystem) – typically over 4G LTE or 5G NR. Not all PSAPs support IMS eCall – IMS‑CS dual‑mode fallback automatically reverts to CS‑domain when the PSAP doesn't support IMS.
Critical qualification: UN‑R144 and EN 17184 do not mandate that 4G/5G hardware must include 3G baseband. However: if the product claims support for IMS‑CS dual‑mode fallback – the hardware must have CS‑domain capability. Many manufacturers misinterpret this as "NG‑eCall = 3G baseband required" – the accurate statement is: don't declare dual‑mode fallback and you don't need 3G; declare it and you must have it.
With multiple EU countries accelerating 3G sunset – relying solely on 3G CS for fallback is unsustainable. OEMs and Tier‑1s are prioritising PSAP‑side IMS eCall support – reducing reliance on CS fallback – CS fallback is a temporary safety net, not a long‑term solution.
5. UN‑R144 Certification Paths
·Integrated vs. STU
UN‑R144 is the UN regulation on eCall system type approval – referenced under the EU WVTA framework. eCall systems follow two certification paths:
·Integrated: eCall functionality is part of the whole‑vehicle WVTA type approval – the eCall system does not get a separate certificate – test results are included in the vehicle's technical file.
·STU (Separate Technical Unit): the eCall system as an independent module applies for R144 type approval – after obtaining an STU certificate, Tier‑1s can sell to different OEMs – the OEM references the STU certificate during whole‑vehicle certification.
·Don't confuse Part Ib and Part II
STU is the official R144 term. Both STU and integrated systems follow Part Ib – Part II is for whole‑vehicle WVTA. AECD (Automotive Emergency Call Device) is an abbreviation for the eCall device itself – not an R144 certification path name – distinguish this in project documentation.
·Module certification boundaries
A pure RF module (cellular baseband + RF front‑end, no eCall application logic) under R144 – does not require backup battery, crash‑trigger, or voice‑path assessment. However, if the module integrates IVS (in‑vehicle emergency call system) logic – even if packaged as a "module" – backup power and trigger interfaces must still be assessed.
6. Backup Power and Temperature Requirements
·Annex X – the 70‑minute duty cycle
(EU) 2025/1871 Annex X specifies the backup‑power duty cycle: 5 minutes of call + 60 minutes of callback standby + 5 minutes of call – total 70 minutes.
Critical: this Annex X backup‑power requirement only takes effect on 1 January 2027. Projects starting in 2026 are not yet subject to this – don't design to the wrong standard.
·Temperature range – applicability
IVS systems typically operate from -40°C to +85°C – applies equally to passenger vehicles – not just commercial vehicles. Some OEMs specify 105°C in their internal standards – that's a commercial requirement – not the regulatory test temperature – keep them separate.
7. China GB 45672-2025
China's eCall counterpart is GB 45672-2025 In‑Vehicle Emergency Call System (AECS) – published 25 April 2025. Mandatory implementation is staggered by vehicle type:
·M1 new type‑approval applications: 1 July 2027.
·M1 already‑type‑approved: 1 July 2028.
·N1 new type‑approval: 1 January 2028.
·N1 already‑type‑approved: 1 January 2029.
It's not a blanket "all vehicles 1 July 2027" – N1 light commercial vehicles need separate scheduling.
GB 45672 and EN 17184 have technical differences – EU certificates cannot directly cover the Chinese market. Global‑platform OEMs need to consider China‑EU standard compatibility in their design.
For eCall certification, contact BlueAsia at 13534225140 (King) or email king.guo@cblueasia.com.
Related News